Family Diplomacy | A Collaborative Law Firm
  • Practice Areas
    • Collaborative Divorce
    • Adoption
    • Divorce
    • Legal Name Change
    • LGBTQ+ Family Law
    • Mediation
    • Prenuptial and Postnuptial Agreements
  • Attorney Profile
    • Adam B. Cordover – Attorney Profile
    • Jennifer Gunnin – Executive Paralegal & Client Care Specialist Profile
    • Isamar Abudeye – Welcome Services Liaison Profile
  • Reach Out to Us
  • Locations
    • Tampa Collaborative Family Law Office
    • Saint Petersburg Collaborative Family Law Office
    • Sarasota Collaborative Family Law Office
  • Education Center
    • Blog
    • Free Florida CLE for Lawyers: Learn When to Refer Clients to Collaborative Divorce
    • FAQs
      • Resources
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
CONTACT US - 813.443.0615

Florida Alimony Reform: Supportive Relationships

April 24, 2013/1 Comment/in Florida Statutes, Legislative Update //Tags: alimony, alimony reform, child custody, collaborative family law, Collaborative Law, collaborative practice, durational alimony, Florida alimony, Florida alimony laws, long term alimony, permanent periodic alimony, rehabilitative alimony, supportive relationshipby Adam B. Cordover, Attorney-at-Law

As Senate Bill 718 dealing with alimony reform and child custody reform has passed both houses of the Florida Legislature and seems likely to be signed by Governor Rick Scott, this blog will attempt to explain how various aspects of the bill may impact Florida and Tampa Bay family law cases.

If signed, most changes (including changes to Florida’s supportive relationship laws) will go into effect July 1, 2013.

Currently, Florida law permits a person who has been ordered to pay alimony (called an “obligor”) to seek a modification or termination of his or her alimony order if he or she can prove that the spouse receiving alimony (called the “obligee”) is in a supportive relationship.  As the law stands now, even if the obligor can prove that the obligee is in a supportive relationship, a judge has the option, but is not required, to modify an alimony order.

The language of Senate Bill 718 changes the supportive relationship statute as follows (new language is underlined while deleted language is stricken):

2.1. [T]he court shall may reduce or terminate an award of alimony upon specific written findings by the court that since the granting of a divorce and the award of alimony, a supportive relationship has existed between the obligee and another a person, except upon a showing by clear and convincing evidence by the obligee that his or her long-term need for alimony, taking into account the totality of the circumstances, has not been reduced by the supportive relationship with whom the obligee resides. On the issue of whether alimony should be reduced or terminated under this paragraph, the burden is on the obligor to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that a supportive relationship exists.

Essentially, the changes require a judge to reduce or terminate alimony if the judge finds that the obligee is in a supportive relationship.  An exception to this requirement exists if the obligee can show that the supportive relationship does not reduce his or her need for alimony (e.g., the person with whom the obligee is in a relationship does not reduce his or her living expenses).

The factors that a judge will look at to determine whether a supportive relationship exists will remain the same:

a. The extent to which the obligee and the other person have held themselves out as a married couple by engaging in conduct such as using the same last name, using a common mailing address, referring to each other in terms such as “my husband” or “my wife,” or otherwise conducting themselves in a manner that evidences a permanent supportive relationship.

b. The period of time that the obligee has resided with the other person in a permanent place of abode.
c. The extent to which the obligee and the other person have pooled their assets or income or otherwise exhibited financial interdependence.
d. The extent to which the obligee or the other person has supported the other, in whole or in part.
e. The extent to which the obligee or the other person has performed valuable services for the other.
f. The extent to which the obligee or the other person has performed valuable services for the other’s company or employer.
g. Whether the obligee and the other person have worked together to create or enhance anything of value.
h. Whether the obligee and the other person have jointly contributed to the purchase of any real or personal property.
i. Evidence in support of a claim that the obligee and the other person have an express agreement regarding property sharing or support.
j. Evidence in support of a claim that the obligee and the other person have an implied agreement regarding property sharing or support.
k. Whether the obligee and the other person have provided support to the children of one another, regardless of any legal duty to do so.

You should keep in mind that, if you entered into a settlement agreement which describes an alimony award as “non-modifiable,” then the changes that will be brought about by Senate Bill 718 will likely not apply to you.

Update: Governor Scott Vetoes Senate Bill 718

If you have questions regarding how the changes may affect your Tampa Bay alimony case and you wish to schedule a consultation with a Tampa Bay alimony attorney, contact The Law Firm of Adam B. Cordover at (813) 443-0615 or by filling out our online form.

Make sure to ask how the private collaborative family law process can keep your alimony case (and your family’s personal and financial information) out of the public court system.

Share
Tweet
Tags: alimony, alimony reform, child custody, collaborative family law, Collaborative Law, collaborative practice, durational alimony, Florida alimony, Florida alimony laws, long term alimony, permanent periodic alimony, rehabilitative alimony, supportive relationship
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail
https://familydiplomacy.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Family-Diplomacy-Logo.jpg 0 0 Adam B. Cordover, Attorney-at-Law https://familydiplomacy.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Family-Diplomacy-Logo.jpg Adam B. Cordover, Attorney-at-Law2013-04-24 11:27:382016-03-15 11:36:22Florida Alimony Reform: Supportive Relationships
You might also like
Facp Logo Retina - Family Diplomacy | A Collaborative Law Firm Will Collaborative Divorce Work in Your Case?
Facp Logo Retina - Family Diplomacy | A Collaborative Law Firm New York Recognizes Gay Marriage. Do Floridians Have Options?
Facp Logo Retina - Family Diplomacy | A Collaborative Law Firm Summary of Florida Alimony Reform Bill
Gary Direnfeld On Sole Custody Video: Do You Really Need “Sole Custody?”
Facp Logo Retina - Family Diplomacy | A Collaborative Law Firm Audio: The Difference of Collaborative Law Part 1
Facp Logo Retina - Family Diplomacy | A Collaborative Law Firm Video: Tiger Woods, Privacy, and Collaborative Divorce
Facp Logo Retina - Family Diplomacy | A Collaborative Law Firm Video: CPA Discusses Collaborative Divorce
Facp Logo Retina - Family Diplomacy | A Collaborative Law Firm Treatment of Children in Hillsborough County Family Law Cases
1 reply

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Florida Alimony Reform: How Long is a “Long-Term” Marriage? | ABC Family Law Blog says:
    April 27, 2013 at 6:20 pm

    […] ← Florida Alimony Reform: Supportive Relationships […]

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Search Search

Categories

  • Divorce
  • Money & Property
  • Collaborative Divorce
  • Kids & Divorce
  • Mediation
  • LGBT Family Law Matters
  • Adoption
  • Case Law Update
  • Family Law News
  • FAQs
  • Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure
  • Florida Statutes
  • Legislative Update
  • Legal Name Change
  • Unbundled Legal Services

Archives

Recent Posts

  • How Do Taxes Affect Retirement Accounts in a Florida Divorce?
  • Birth Certificate Amendments and Corrections: When You May Need a Legal Name Change in Florida
  • What is Equitable Distribution in Florida?
  • What Is Collaborative Divorce? 3 Defining Elements.
  • Sarasota Divorce Law Firm Review: “[The] Team You Want In Your Corner”

Want to Learn More?

When Discretion Matters, Count On Us

Reach Out to Us

Lawyer Adam Cordover | Lawyer Divorce
Lawyer Adam Cordover | Top Attorney Divorce

Our Offices (by appointment)

TAMPA - 3030 North Rocky Point Drive, Suite 150, Tampa, FL 33607

SAINT PETERSBURG - 475 Central Avenue, Suite 205, St. Petersburg, FL 33701

SARASOTA - 1858 Ringling Boulevard, Suite 110, Sarasota, FL 34236

Accepting Clients Throughout the State of Florida

Want to Learn More? When Discretion Matters, Count On Us.

Reach Out to Us

Recent Posts

  • How Do Taxes Affect Retirement Accounts in a Florida Divorce? July 8, 2026
  • Birth Certificate Amendments and Corrections: When You May Need a Legal Name Change in Florida July 1, 2026
  • What is Equitable Distribution in Florida? June 15, 2026
  • What Is Collaborative Divorce? 3 Defining Elements. June 9, 2026
  • Sarasota Divorce Law Firm Review: “[The] Team You Want In Your Corner” June 2, 2026
© 2025 FAMILY DIPLOMACY: A COLLABORATIVE LAW FIRM. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to X
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Rss this site
  • Home
  • Practice Areas
  • Attorney Profile
  • Schedule a Consultation or Learn More
  • Locations
  • Blog
  • FAQ
  • Make A Payment
Link to: Florida Child Custody Reform 2013 Link to: Florida Child Custody Reform 2013 Florida Child Custody Reform 2013 Link to: Florida Alimony Reform: How Long is a “Long-Term” Marriage? Link to: Florida Alimony Reform: How Long is a “Long-Term” Marriage? Florida Alimony Reform: How Long is a “Long-Term” Marriage?
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top